WAIVER ENGINE · LIVE ESPN · v0.4.6.2
Longboys decision board
Calibrated live mode: the board now separates player quality from transaction value. Claim means the incoming player clears the actual Longboys drop cost plus the roster-fit hurdle; K and D/ST require a real Week 1 edge over the current starter. The Aug. 17 board is historical context only.
Player Value blends absolute ESPN projection strength with within-position standing, so a thin waiver pool no longer makes every top available player look elite.
Raw Δ is incoming Player Value minus the named drop candidate. Roster fit is the explicit positional adjustment. Net Δ is what drives Claim/Watch/Ignore.
Ignore
Adonai Mitchell
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
7.5
(8.2)
Season
126.7
(150.2)
Value
73
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
+2.7
Adonai Mitchell
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Season projection -23.5 versus comparison player
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 73.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -1.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- +2.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- Romeo Doubs
- Week projection
- 7.5
- Season projection
- 126.7
- ESPN rostered
- 12.7%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 73 vs Romeo Doubs retention 74 (-1.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 73.1
- Raw Δ
- -1.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- +2.7
- UI fit score
- 52.7
Ignore
Malik Washington
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
7.4
(8.2)
Season
115.9
(150.2)
Value
71
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
+0.4
Malik Washington
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Season projection -34.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -3.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 70.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -3.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- +0.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 7.4
- Season projection
- 115.9
- ESPN rostered
- 6.6%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 71 vs — retention 74 (-3.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 70.8
- Raw Δ
- -3.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- +0.4
- UI fit score
- 50.4
Ignore
Darnell Mooney
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.9
(8.2)
Season
160.8
(150.2)
Value
71
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
+0.3
Darnell Mooney
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Raw player-value loss of -3.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 70.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -3.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- +0.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.9
- Season projection
- 160.8
- ESPN rostered
- 3.8%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 71 vs — retention 74 (-3.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 70.8
- Raw Δ
- -3.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- +0.3
- UI fit score
- 50.3
Ignore
Tyreek Hill
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
263.7
(150.2)
Value
69
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-1.1
Tyreek Hill
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Season projection +113.5 versus comparison player
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -5.1
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 69.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -5.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -1.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 263.7
- ESPN rostered
- 4.9%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 69 vs — retention 74 (-5.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 69.4
- Raw Δ
- -5.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -1.1
- UI fit score
- 48.9
Ignore
Jaylin Noel
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
7.1
(8.2)
Season
113.3
(150.2)
Value
69
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-1.2
Jaylin Noel
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -1.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -36.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -5.2
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 69.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -5.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -1.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 7.1
- Season projection
- 113.3
- ESPN rostered
- 3.9%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 69 vs — retention 74 (-5.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 69.3
- Raw Δ
- -5.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -1.2
- UI fit score
- 48.8
Ignore
Marvin Mims Jr.
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
4.0
(8.2)
Season
149.1
(150.2)
Value
69
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-1.8
Marvin Mims Jr.
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Raw player-value loss of -5.8
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 68.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -5.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -1.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.0
- Season projection
- 149.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.9%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 69 vs — retention 74 (-5.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 68.6
- Raw Δ
- -5.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -1.8
- UI fit score
- 48.2
Ignore
Hollywood Brown
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.1
(8.2)
Season
174.0
(150.2)
Value
68
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-2.2
Hollywood Brown
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Season projection +23.8 versus comparison player
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Raw player-value loss of -6.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 68.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -6.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -2.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.1
- Season projection
- 174.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.7%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 68 vs — retention 74 (-6.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 68.2
- Raw Δ
- -6.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -2.2
- UI fit score
- 47.8
Ignore
Germie Bernard
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
6.8
(8.2)
Season
108.8
(150.2)
Value
68
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-2.5
Germie Bernard
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -1.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -41.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -6.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 68.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -6.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -2.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 6.8
- Season projection
- 108.8
- ESPN rostered
- 8.0%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 68 vs — retention 74 (-6.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 68.0
- Raw Δ
- -6.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -2.5
- UI fit score
- 47.5
Ignore
Dontayvion Wicks
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
6.7
(8.2)
Season
108.2
(150.2)
Value
68
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-2.9
Dontayvion Wicks
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -1.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -42.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -6.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 67.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -6.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -2.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 6.7
- Season projection
- 108.2
- ESPN rostered
- 7.0%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 68 vs — retention 74 (-6.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 67.5
- Raw Δ
- -6.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -2.9
- UI fit score
- 47.1
Ignore
Darius Slayton
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
5.4
(8.2)
Season
115.2
(150.2)
Value
66
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-4.4
Darius Slayton
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -2.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -35.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -8.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 66.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -8.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -4.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 5.4
- Season projection
- 115.2
- ESPN rostered
- 1.4%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 66 vs — retention 74 (-8.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 66.1
- Raw Δ
- -8.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -4.4
- UI fit score
- 45.6
Ignore
Ricky Pearsall
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
198.4
(150.2)
Value
65
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-5.2
Ricky Pearsall
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Season projection +48.2 versus comparison player
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Raw player-value loss of -9.2
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 65.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -9.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -5.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 198.4
- ESPN rostered
- 13.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 65 vs — retention 74 (-9.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 65.3
- Raw Δ
- -9.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -5.2
- UI fit score
- 44.8
Ignore
Ja'Kobi Lane
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
6.0
(8.2)
Season
100.5
(150.2)
Value
65
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-5.7
Ja'Kobi Lane
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -2.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -49.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -9.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 64.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -9.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -5.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 6.0
- Season projection
- 100.5
- ESPN rostered
- 16.4%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 65 vs — retention 74 (-9.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 64.7
- Raw Δ
- -9.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -5.7
- UI fit score
- 44.3
Ignore
Tutu Atwell
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.1
(8.2)
Season
114.3
(150.2)
Value
63
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-7.9
Tutu Atwell
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -35.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -11.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 62.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -11.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -7.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.1
- Season projection
- 114.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 63 vs — retention 74 (-11.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 62.6
- Raw Δ
- -11.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -7.9
- UI fit score
- 42.1
Ignore
Christian Kirk
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
2.6
(8.2)
Season
129.2
(150.2)
Value
62
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-8.2
Christian Kirk
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -21.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -12.2
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 62.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -12.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -8.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.6
- Season projection
- 129.2
- ESPN rostered
- 1.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 62 vs — retention 74 (-12.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 62.2
- Raw Δ
- -12.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -8.2
- UI fit score
- 41.8
Ignore
Tre' Harris
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
5.6
(8.2)
Season
89.9
(150.2)
Value
61
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-9.0
Tre' Harris
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -2.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -60.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -13.0
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 61.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -13.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -9.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 5.6
- Season projection
- 89.9
- ESPN rostered
- 4.3%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 61 vs — retention 74 (-13.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 61.4
- Raw Δ
- -13.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -9.0
- UI fit score
- 41.0
Ignore
Ryan Flournoy
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
5.3
(8.2)
Season
89.3
(150.2)
Value
61
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-9.9
Ryan Flournoy
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -2.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -60.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -13.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 60.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -13.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -9.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 5.3
- Season projection
- 89.3
- ESPN rostered
- 4.0%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 61 vs — retention 74 (-13.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 60.6
- Raw Δ
- -13.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -9.9
- UI fit score
- 40.1
Ignore
Jalen Tolbert
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
5.9
(8.2)
Season
85.6
(150.2)
Value
60
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-10.1
Jalen Tolbert
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -2.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -64.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -14.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 60.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -14.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -10.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 5.9
- Season projection
- 85.6
- ESPN rostered
- 1.0%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 60 vs — retention 74 (-14.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 60.4
- Raw Δ
- -14.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -10.1
- UI fit score
- 39.9
Ignore
Jahan Dotson
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
5.2
(8.2)
Season
92.8
(150.2)
Value
60
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-10.1
Jahan Dotson
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -57.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -14.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 60.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -14.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -10.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 5.2
- Season projection
- 92.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.9%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 60 vs — retention 74 (-14.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 60.4
- Raw Δ
- -14.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -10.1
- UI fit score
- 39.9
Ignore
Cedric Tillman
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.4
(8.2)
Season
166.0
(150.2)
Value
60
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-10.1
Cedric Tillman
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Season projection +15.8 versus comparison player
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Raw player-value loss of -14.1
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 60.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -14.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -10.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.4
- Season projection
- 166.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 60 vs — retention 74 (-14.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 60.4
- Raw Δ
- -14.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -10.1
- UI fit score
- 39.9
Ignore
KaVontae Turpin
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.0
(8.2)
Season
104.2
(150.2)
Value
60
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-10.3
KaVontae Turpin
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -46.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -14.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 60.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -14.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -10.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.0
- Season projection
- 104.2
- ESPN rostered
- 1.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 60 vs — retention 74 (-14.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 60.1
- Raw Δ
- -14.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -10.3
- UI fit score
- 39.7
Ignore
Pat Bryant
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.2
(8.2)
Season
95.5
(150.2)
Value
59
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-11.3
Pat Bryant
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -54.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -15.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 59.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -15.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -11.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.2
- Season projection
- 95.5
- ESPN rostered
- 2.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 59 vs — retention 74 (-15.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 59.2
- Raw Δ
- -15.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -11.3
- UI fit score
- 38.7
Ignore
Jayden Higgins
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
161.5
(150.2)
Value
59
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-11.4
Jayden Higgins
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Raw player-value loss of -15.4
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 59.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -15.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -11.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 161.5
- ESPN rostered
- 18.6%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 59 vs — retention 74 (-15.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 59.1
- Raw Δ
- -15.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -11.4
- UI fit score
- 38.6
Ignore
Joshua Palmer
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.8
(8.2)
Season
111.2
(150.2)
Value
58
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-11.9
Joshua Palmer
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -39.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -15.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 58.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -15.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -11.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.8
- Season projection
- 111.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 59 vs — retention 74 (-15.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 58.5
- Raw Δ
- -15.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -11.9
- UI fit score
- 38.1
Ignore
Zachariah Branch
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.6
(8.2)
Season
82.5
(150.2)
Value
58
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-12.2
Zachariah Branch
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -67.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -16.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 58.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -16.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -12.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.6
- Season projection
- 82.5
- ESPN rostered
- 5.7%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 58 vs — retention 74 (-16.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 58.2
- Raw Δ
- -16.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -12.2
- UI fit score
- 37.8
Ignore
Dyami Brown
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.7
(8.2)
Season
107.3
(150.2)
Value
57
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-13.6
Dyami Brown
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -42.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -17.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 56.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -17.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -13.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.7
- Season projection
- 107.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 57 vs — retention 74 (-17.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 56.8
- Raw Δ
- -17.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -13.6
- UI fit score
- 36.4
Ignore
Antonio Williams
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.3
(8.2)
Season
77.8
(150.2)
Value
56
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-14.0
Antonio Williams
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -72.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -18.0
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 56.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -18.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -14.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.3
- Season projection
- 77.8
- ESPN rostered
- 3.5%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 56 vs — retention 74 (-18.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 56.5
- Raw Δ
- -18.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -14.0
- UI fit score
- 36.0
Ignore
Tyquan Thornton
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.3
(8.2)
Season
77.5
(150.2)
Value
56
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-14.9
Tyquan Thornton
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -72.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -18.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 55.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -18.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -14.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.3
- Season projection
- 77.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.9%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 56 vs — retention 74 (-18.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 55.6
- Raw Δ
- -18.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -14.9
- UI fit score
- 35.1
Ignore
Isaac TeSlaa
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.2
(8.2)
Season
72.8
(150.2)
Value
55
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-15.1
Isaac TeSlaa
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -77.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -19.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 55.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -19.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -15.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.2
- Season projection
- 72.8
- ESPN rostered
- 4.0%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 55 vs — retention 74 (-19.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 55.4
- Raw Δ
- -19.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -15.1
- UI fit score
- 34.9
Ignore
Jack Bech
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.3
(8.2)
Season
65.9
(150.2)
Value
54
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-16.8
Jack Bech
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -84.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -20.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 53.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -20.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -16.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.3
- Season projection
- 65.9
- ESPN rostered
- 1.7%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 54 vs — retention 74 (-20.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 53.6
- Raw Δ
- -20.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -16.8
- UI fit score
- 33.2
Ignore
Omar Cooper Jr.
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.0
(8.2)
Season
67.3
(150.2)
Value
54
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-16.9
Omar Cooper Jr.
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -82.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -20.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 53.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -20.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -16.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.0
- Season projection
- 67.3
- ESPN rostered
- 10.4%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 54 vs — retention 74 (-20.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 53.6
- Raw Δ
- -20.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -16.9
- UI fit score
- 33.1
Ignore
Troy Franklin
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.9
(8.2)
Season
79.7
(150.2)
Value
53
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-17.4
Troy Franklin
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -70.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -21.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 53.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -21.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -17.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.9
- Season projection
- 79.7
- ESPN rostered
- 1.6%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 53 vs — retention 74 (-21.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 53.0
- Raw Δ
- -21.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -17.4
- UI fit score
- 32.6
Ignore
Nick Westbrook-Ikhine
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
109.5
(150.2)
Value
53
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-17.7
Nick Westbrook-Ikhine
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -40.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -21.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 52.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -21.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -17.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 109.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 53 vs — retention 74 (-21.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 52.7
- Raw Δ
- -21.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -17.7
- UI fit score
- 32.3
Ignore
Xavier Hutchinson
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.2
(8.2)
Season
66.4
(150.2)
Value
53
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-17.8
Xavier Hutchinson
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -83.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -21.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 52.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -21.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -17.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.2
- Season projection
- 66.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.5%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 53 vs — retention 74 (-21.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 52.7
- Raw Δ
- -21.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -17.8
- UI fit score
- 32.2
Ignore
Andrei Iosivas
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.4
(8.2)
Season
71.5
(150.2)
Value
52
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-18.4
Andrei Iosivas
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -78.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -22.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 52.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -22.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -18.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.4
- Season projection
- 71.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.6%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 52 vs — retention 74 (-22.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 52.1
- Raw Δ
- -22.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -18.4
- UI fit score
- 31.6
Ignore
Calvin Austin III
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
107.5
(150.2)
Value
52
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-18.4
Calvin Austin III
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -42.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -22.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 52.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -22.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -18.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 107.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 52 vs — retention 74 (-22.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 52.1
- Raw Δ
- -22.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -18.4
- UI fit score
- 31.6
Ignore
Ted Hurst III
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.0
(8.2)
Season
64.9
(150.2)
Value
52
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-18.8
Ted Hurst III
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -85.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -22.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 51.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -22.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -18.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.0
- Season projection
- 64.9
- ESPN rostered
- 1.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 52 vs — retention 74 (-22.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 51.7
- Raw Δ
- -22.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -18.8
- UI fit score
- 31.2
Ignore
Tory Horton
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
3.8
(8.2)
Season
65.5
(150.2)
Value
52
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-19.0
Tory Horton
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -84.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -23.0
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 51.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -23.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -19.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.8
- Season projection
- 65.5
- ESPN rostered
- 1.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 51 vs — retention 74 (-23.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 51.5
- Raw Δ
- -23.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -19.0
- UI fit score
- 31.0
Ignore
Malachi Fields
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.6
(8.2)
Season
59.9
(150.2)
Value
50
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-20.4
Malachi Fields
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -90.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -24.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 50.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -24.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -20.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.6
- Season projection
- 59.9
- ESPN rostered
- 2.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 50 vs — retention 74 (-24.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 50.0
- Raw Δ
- -24.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -20.4
- UI fit score
- 29.6
Ignore
Elic Ayomanor
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.4
(8.2)
Season
88.8
(150.2)
Value
50
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-20.7
Elic Ayomanor
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -61.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -24.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 49.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -24.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -20.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.4
- Season projection
- 88.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 50 vs — retention 74 (-24.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 49.8
- Raw Δ
- -24.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -20.7
- UI fit score
- 29.3
Ignore
Savion Williams
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.5
(8.2)
Season
60.6
(150.2)
Value
50
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-20.9
Savion Williams
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -89.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -24.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 49.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -24.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -20.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.5
- Season projection
- 60.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.5%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 50 vs — retention 74 (-24.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 49.6
- Raw Δ
- -24.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -20.9
- UI fit score
- 29.1
Ignore
Brandon Aiyuk
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · OUT
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
112.5
(150.2)
Value
49
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-21.7
Brandon Aiyuk
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · OUT
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Season projection -37.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -25.7
- Injury/status: OUT
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 48.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -25.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -21.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 112.5
- ESPN rostered
- 2.4%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 49 vs — retention 74 (-25.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 48.8
- Raw Δ
- -25.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -21.7
- UI fit score
- 28.3
Ignore
Roman Wilson
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.8
(8.2)
Season
69.4
(150.2)
Value
47
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-23.6
Roman Wilson
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -80.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -27.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 46.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -27.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -23.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.8
- Season projection
- 69.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 47 vs — retention 74 (-27.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 46.9
- Raw Δ
- -27.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -23.6
- UI fit score
- 26.4
Ignore
Ray-Ray McCloud III
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
111.0
(150.2)
Value
46
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-24.8
Ray-Ray McCloud III
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -39.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -28.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 45.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -28.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -24.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 111.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 46 vs — retention 74 (-28.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 45.6
- Raw Δ
- -28.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -24.8
- UI fit score
- 25.2
Ignore
Kendrick Bourne
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.0
(8.2)
Season
50.3
(150.2)
Value
46
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-25.0
Kendrick Bourne
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -99.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -29.0
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 45.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -29.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -25.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.0
- Season projection
- 50.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 45 vs — retention 74 (-29.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 45.5
- Raw Δ
- -29.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -25.0
- UI fit score
- 25.0
Ignore
Malik Benson
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.1
(8.2)
Season
48.3
(150.2)
Value
45
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-25.1
Malik Benson
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -101.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -29.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 45.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -29.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -25.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.1
- Season projection
- 48.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 45 vs — retention 74 (-29.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 45.4
- Raw Δ
- -29.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -25.1
- UI fit score
- 24.9
Ignore
Kalif Raymond
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.8
(8.2)
Season
48.0
(150.2)
Value
45
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-25.7
Kalif Raymond
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -102.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -29.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -29.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -25.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.8
- Season projection
- 48.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 45 vs — retention 74 (-29.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 44.7
- Raw Δ
- -29.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -25.7
- UI fit score
- 24.3
Ignore
Dont'e Thornton Jr.
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
1.1
(8.2)
Season
70.4
(150.2)
Value
44
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-26.1
Dont'e Thornton Jr.
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -79.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -30.1
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -30.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.1
- Season projection
- 70.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 44 vs — retention 74 (-30.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 44.3
- Raw Δ
- -30.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.1
- UI fit score
- 23.9
Ignore
Bryce Lance
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.5
(8.2)
Season
39.5
(150.2)
Value
44
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-26.2
Bryce Lance
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -110.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -30.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -30.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.5
- Season projection
- 39.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 44 vs — retention 74 (-30.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 44.3
- Raw Δ
- -30.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.2
- UI fit score
- 23.8
Ignore
Jordan Whittington
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.9
(8.2)
Season
58.8
(150.2)
Value
44
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-26.2
Jordan Whittington
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -6.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -91.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -30.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -30.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.9
- Season projection
- 58.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 44 vs — retention 74 (-30.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 44.2
- Raw Δ
- -30.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.2
- UI fit score
- 23.8
Ignore
Adam Thielen
WR · 23 · WAIVERS
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
106.9
(150.2)
Value
44
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-26.3
Adam Thielen
WR · 23 · WAIVERS
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -43.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -30.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -30.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 106.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 44 vs — retention 74 (-30.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 44.2
- Raw Δ
- -30.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.3
- UI fit score
- 23.7
Ignore
Cyrus Allen
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.4
(8.2)
Season
44.0
(150.2)
Value
44
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-26.3
Cyrus Allen
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -106.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -30.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -30.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.4
- Season projection
- 44.0
- ESPN rostered
- 5.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 44 vs — retention 74 (-30.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 44.1
- Raw Δ
- -30.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.3
- UI fit score
- 23.7
Ignore
Isaiah Bond
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.8
(8.2)
Season
58.1
(150.2)
Value
44
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-26.4
Isaiah Bond
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -92.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -30.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -30.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.8
- Season projection
- 58.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 44 vs — retention 74 (-30.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 44.0
- Raw Δ
- -30.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.4
- UI fit score
- 23.6
Ignore
Isaiah Williams
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.8
(8.2)
Season
46.8
(150.2)
Value
44
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-26.7
Isaiah Williams
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -103.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -30.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 43.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -30.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.8
- Season projection
- 46.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 44 vs — retention 74 (-30.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 43.7
- Raw Δ
- -30.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -26.7
- UI fit score
- 23.3
Ignore
Tyler Lockett
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
99.8
(150.2)
Value
43
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-27.8
Tyler Lockett
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -50.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -31.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 42.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -31.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -27.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 99.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 43 vs — retention 74 (-31.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 42.7
- Raw Δ
- -31.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -27.8
- UI fit score
- 22.2
Ignore
Mack Hollins
WR · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.5
(8.2)
Season
53.8
(150.2)
Value
43
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-27.8
Mack Hollins
WR · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -96.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -31.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 42.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -31.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -27.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.5
- Season projection
- 53.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 43 vs — retention 74 (-31.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 42.6
- Raw Δ
- -31.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -27.8
- UI fit score
- 22.2
Ignore
Treylon Burks
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.5
(8.2)
Season
45.0
(150.2)
Value
42
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-27.9
Treylon Burks
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -105.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -31.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 42.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -31.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -27.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.5
- Season projection
- 45.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 43 vs — retention 74 (-31.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 42.5
- Raw Δ
- -31.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -27.9
- UI fit score
- 22.1
Ignore
Devontez Walker
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.6
(8.2)
Season
44.0
(150.2)
Value
42
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-28.2
Devontez Walker
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -106.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -32.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 42.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -32.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -28.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.6
- Season projection
- 44.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 42 vs — retention 74 (-32.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 42.3
- Raw Δ
- -32.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -28.2
- UI fit score
- 21.8
Ignore
Chimere Dike
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.4
(8.2)
Season
39.4
(150.2)
Value
42
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-28.3
Chimere Dike
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -110.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -32.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 42.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -32.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -28.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.4
- Season projection
- 39.4
- ESPN rostered
- 1.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 42 vs — retention 74 (-32.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 42.1
- Raw Δ
- -32.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -28.3
- UI fit score
- 21.7
Ignore
Josh Reynolds
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
103.9
(150.2)
Value
41
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-29.1
Josh Reynolds
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -46.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -33.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 41.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -33.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 103.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 41 vs — retention 74 (-33.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 41.3
- Raw Δ
- -33.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.1
- UI fit score
- 20.9
Ignore
Noah Brown
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
103.2
(150.2)
Value
41
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-29.3
Noah Brown
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -47.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -33.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 41.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -33.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 103.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 41 vs — retention 74 (-33.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 41.1
- Raw Δ
- -33.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.3
- UI fit score
- 20.7
Ignore
Colbie Young
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.3
(8.2)
Season
39.6
(150.2)
Value
41
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-29.4
Colbie Young
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -110.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -33.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 41.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -33.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.3
- Season projection
- 39.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 41 vs — retention 74 (-33.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 41.1
- Raw Δ
- -33.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.4
- UI fit score
- 20.6
Ignore
DeAndre Hopkins
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
88.7
(150.2)
Value
41
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-29.4
DeAndre Hopkins
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -61.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -33.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 41.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -33.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 88.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 41 vs — retention 74 (-33.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 41.0
- Raw Δ
- -33.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.4
- UI fit score
- 20.6
Ignore
Greg Dortch
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
60.0
(150.2)
Value
41
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-29.5
Greg Dortch
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -90.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -33.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 41.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -33.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 60.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 41 vs — retention 74 (-33.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 41.0
- Raw Δ
- -33.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -29.5
- UI fit score
- 20.5
Ignore
Zavion Thomas
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.1
(8.2)
Season
36.2
(150.2)
Value
40
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-30.2
Zavion Thomas
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -114.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -34.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 40.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -34.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -30.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.1
- Season projection
- 36.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 40 vs — retention 74 (-34.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 40.2
- Raw Δ
- -34.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -30.2
- UI fit score
- 19.8
Ignore
Brandin Cooks
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
91.2
(150.2)
Value
40
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-30.4
Brandin Cooks
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -59.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -34.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 40.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -34.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -30.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 91.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 40 vs — retention 74 (-34.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 40.1
- Raw Δ
- -34.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -30.4
- UI fit score
- 19.6
Ignore
Kevin Coleman Jr.
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.7
(8.2)
Season
32.9
(150.2)
Value
40
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-30.7
Kevin Coleman Jr.
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -117.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -34.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 39.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -34.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -30.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.7
- Season projection
- 32.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 40 vs — retention 74 (-34.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 39.8
- Raw Δ
- -34.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -30.7
- UI fit score
- 19.3
Ignore
Elijah Sarratt
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.0
(8.2)
Season
33.6
(150.2)
Value
40
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-31.0
Elijah Sarratt
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -116.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -35.0
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 39.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -35.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.0
- Season projection
- 33.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.5%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 39 vs — retention 74 (-35.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 39.5
- Raw Δ
- -35.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.0
- UI fit score
- 19.0
Ignore
Jaylin Lane
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.1
(8.2)
Season
37.3
(150.2)
Value
39
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-31.1
Jaylin Lane
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -6.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -112.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -35.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 39.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -35.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.1
- Season projection
- 37.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 39 vs — retention 74 (-35.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 39.4
- Raw Δ
- -35.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.1
- UI fit score
- 18.9
Ignore
Kyle Williams
WR · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.2
(8.2)
Season
41.5
(150.2)
Value
39
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-31.4
Kyle Williams
WR · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -7.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -108.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -35.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 39.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -35.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.2
- Season projection
- 41.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 39 vs — retention 74 (-35.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 39.1
- Raw Δ
- -35.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.4
- UI fit score
- 18.6
Ignore
JuJu Smith-Schuster
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
70.3
(150.2)
Value
39
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-31.5
JuJu Smith-Schuster
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -79.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -35.5
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 38.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -35.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 70.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 39 vs — retention 74 (-35.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 38.9
- Raw Δ
- -35.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.5
- UI fit score
- 18.5
Ignore
Olamide Zaccheaus
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.8
(8.2)
Season
36.7
(150.2)
Value
39
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-31.7
Olamide Zaccheaus
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -6.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -113.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -35.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 38.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -35.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.8
- Season projection
- 36.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 39 vs — retention 74 (-35.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 38.8
- Raw Δ
- -35.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.7
- UI fit score
- 18.3
Ignore
Chris Bell
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
61.4
(150.2)
Value
38
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-31.9
Chris Bell
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -88.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -35.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 38.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -35.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 61.4
- ESPN rostered
- 2.5%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 39 vs — retention 74 (-35.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 38.5
- Raw Δ
- -35.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -31.9
- UI fit score
- 18.1
Ignore
Skyler Bell
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
1.9
(8.2)
Season
28.5
(150.2)
Value
38
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-32.8
Skyler Bell
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -121.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -36.8
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 37.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -36.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -32.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.9
- Season projection
- 28.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.4%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 38 vs — retention 74 (-36.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 37.6
- Raw Δ
- -36.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -32.8
- UI fit score
- 17.2
Ignore
Mitchell Tinsley
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.6
(8.2)
Season
48.3
(150.2)
Value
37
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-33.4
Mitchell Tinsley
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -101.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -37.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 37.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -37.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -33.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.6
- Season projection
- 48.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 37 vs — retention 74 (-37.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 37.1
- Raw Δ
- -37.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -33.4
- UI fit score
- 16.6
Ignore
Brenen Thompson
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
1.7
(8.2)
Season
27.5
(150.2)
Value
36
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-34.2
Brenen Thompson
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -6.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -122.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -38.2
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 36.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -38.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -34.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.7
- Season projection
- 27.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 36 vs — retention 74 (-38.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 36.3
- Raw Δ
- -38.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -34.2
- UI fit score
- 15.8
Ignore
Ashton Dulin
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.7
(8.2)
Season
29.9
(150.2)
Value
36
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-34.3
Ashton Dulin
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -6.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -120.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -38.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 36.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -38.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -34.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.7
- Season projection
- 29.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 36 vs — retention 74 (-38.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 36.1
- Raw Δ
- -38.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -34.3
- UI fit score
- 15.7
Ignore
Odell Beckham Jr.
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.5
(8.2)
Season
24.1
(150.2)
Value
36
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-34.5
Odell Beckham Jr.
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -126.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -38.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 36.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -38.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -34.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.5
- Season projection
- 24.1
- ESPN rostered
- 2.9%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 36 vs — retention 74 (-38.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 36.0
- Raw Δ
- -38.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -34.5
- UI fit score
- 15.5
Ignore
Konata Mumpfield
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.7
(8.2)
Season
29.2
(150.2)
Value
36
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-34.5
Konata Mumpfield
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -6.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -121.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -38.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 35.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -38.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -34.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.7
- Season projection
- 29.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 36 vs — retention 74 (-38.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 35.9
- Raw Δ
- -38.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -34.5
- UI fit score
- 15.5
Ignore
Tyler Johnson
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
68.3
(150.2)
Value
35
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-35.1
Tyler Johnson
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -81.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -39.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 35.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -39.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -35.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 68.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 35 vs — retention 74 (-39.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 35.3
- Raw Δ
- -39.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -35.1
- UI fit score
- 14.9
Ignore
Luke McCaffrey
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
27.5
(150.2)
Value
35
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-35.6
Luke McCaffrey
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -7.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -122.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -39.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 34.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -39.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -35.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 27.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.4%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 35 vs — retention 74 (-39.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 34.8
- Raw Δ
- -39.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -35.6
- UI fit score
- 14.4
Ignore
Arian Smith
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.2
(8.2)
Season
45.0
(150.2)
Value
34
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-36.2
Arian Smith
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -105.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -40.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 34.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -40.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -36.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.2
- Season projection
- 45.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 34 vs — retention 74 (-40.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 34.2
- Raw Δ
- -40.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -36.2
- UI fit score
- 13.8
Ignore
Van Jefferson
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
53.5
(150.2)
Value
34
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-36.3
Van Jefferson
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -96.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -40.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 34.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -40.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -36.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 53.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 34 vs — retention 74 (-40.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 34.1
- Raw Δ
- -40.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -36.3
- UI fit score
- 13.7
Ignore
Tez Johnson
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
1.3
(8.2)
Season
21.6
(150.2)
Value
34
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-36.7
Tez Johnson
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -128.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -40.7
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 33.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -40.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -36.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.3
- Season projection
- 21.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 34 vs — retention 74 (-40.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 33.8
- Raw Δ
- -40.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -36.7
- UI fit score
- 13.3
Ignore
Justin Watson
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.6
(8.2)
Season
25.8
(150.2)
Value
34
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-36.8
Justin Watson
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -6.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -124.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -40.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 33.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -40.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -36.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.6
- Season projection
- 25.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 34 vs — retention 74 (-40.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 33.7
- Raw Δ
- -40.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -36.8
- UI fit score
- 13.2
Ignore
Allen Lazard
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
65.9
(150.2)
Value
33
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-37.0
Allen Lazard
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -84.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.0
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 33.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 65.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 33.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.0
- UI fit score
- 13.0
Ignore
Mason Tipton
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · OUT
Week
2.4
(8.2)
Season
17.4
(150.2)
Value
33
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-37.2
Mason Tipton
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · OUT
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -5.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -132.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.2
- Injury/status: OUT
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 33.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.4
- Season projection
- 17.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 33.3
- Raw Δ
- -41.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.2
- UI fit score
- 12.8
Ignore
Jalen Royals
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
24.4
(150.2)
Value
33
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-37.4
Jalen Royals
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -125.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 33.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 24.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 33.1
- Raw Δ
- -41.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.4
- UI fit score
- 12.6
Ignore
Jimmy Horn Jr.
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.3
(8.2)
Season
21.2
(150.2)
Value
33
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-37.4
Jimmy Horn Jr.
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -6.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -129.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 33.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.3
- Season projection
- 21.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 33.0
- Raw Δ
- -41.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.4
- UI fit score
- 12.6
Ignore
Hunter Renfrow
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
61.8
(150.2)
Value
33
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-37.9
Hunter Renfrow
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -88.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 32.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 61.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 32.6
- Raw Δ
- -41.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -37.9
- UI fit score
- 12.1
Ignore
KeAndre Lambert-Smith
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.1
(8.2)
Season
21.9
(150.2)
Value
32
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-38.4
KeAndre Lambert-Smith
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -128.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -42.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 32.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -42.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -38.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.1
- Season projection
- 21.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 32 vs — retention 74 (-42.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 32.1
- Raw Δ
- -42.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -38.4
- UI fit score
- 11.6
Ignore
Demarcus Robinson
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
25.1
(150.2)
Value
31
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-39.3
Demarcus Robinson
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -125.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -43.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 31.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -43.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -39.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 25.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 31 vs — retention 74 (-43.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 31.1
- Raw Δ
- -43.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -39.3
- UI fit score
- 10.7
Ignore
Barion Brown
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
13.2
(150.2)
Value
31
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-39.5
Barion Brown
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -137.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -43.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 30.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -43.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -39.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 13.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 31 vs — retention 74 (-43.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 30.9
- Raw Δ
- -43.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -39.5
- UI fit score
- 10.5
Ignore
David Moore
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
36.3
(150.2)
Value
30
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-40.9
David Moore
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -113.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -44.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 29.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -44.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -40.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 36.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 30 vs — retention 74 (-44.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 29.6
- Raw Δ
- -44.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -40.9
- UI fit score
- 9.1
Ignore
Derius Davis
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.8
(8.2)
Season
19.2
(150.2)
Value
29
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-41.3
Derius Davis
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -131.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -45.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 29.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -45.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -41.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.8
- Season projection
- 19.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 29 vs — retention 74 (-45.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 29.1
- Raw Δ
- -45.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -41.3
- UI fit score
- 8.7
Ignore
Curtis Samuel
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
46.3
(150.2)
Value
29
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-41.4
Curtis Samuel
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -103.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -45.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 29.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -45.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -41.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 46.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 29 vs — retention 74 (-45.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 29.0
- Raw Δ
- -45.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -41.4
- UI fit score
- 8.6
Ignore
Jake Bobo
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
31.6
(150.2)
Value
29
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-41.7
Jake Bobo
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -118.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -45.7
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 28.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -45.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -41.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 31.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 29 vs — retention 74 (-45.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 28.8
- Raw Δ
- -45.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -41.7
- UI fit score
- 8.3
Ignore
Bo Melton
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.7
(8.2)
Season
11.7
(150.2)
Value
28
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-42.1
Bo Melton
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -138.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -46.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 28.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -46.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -42.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.7
- Season projection
- 11.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 28 vs — retention 74 (-46.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 28.4
- Raw Δ
- -46.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -42.1
- UI fit score
- 7.9
Ignore
Tai Felton
WR · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
11.6
(150.2)
Value
28
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-42.3
Tai Felton
WR · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -138.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -46.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 28.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -46.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -42.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 11.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 28 vs — retention 74 (-46.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 28.2
- Raw Δ
- -46.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -42.3
- UI fit score
- 7.7
Ignore
Xavier Smith
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.7
(8.2)
Season
11.6
(150.2)
Value
28
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-42.3
Xavier Smith
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -138.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -46.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 28.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -46.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -42.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.7
- Season projection
- 11.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 28 vs — retention 74 (-46.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 28.1
- Raw Δ
- -46.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -42.3
- UI fit score
- 7.7
Ignore
CJ Daniels
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.6
(8.2)
Season
9.6
(150.2)
Value
28
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-42.9
CJ Daniels
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -140.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -46.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 27.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -46.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -42.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.6
- Season projection
- 9.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 28 vs — retention 74 (-46.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 27.5
- Raw Δ
- -46.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -42.9
- UI fit score
- 7.1
Ignore
Jahdae Walker
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
8.7
(150.2)
Value
27
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-43.5
Jahdae Walker
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -141.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -47.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 26.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -47.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -43.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 8.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 27 vs — retention 74 (-47.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 26.9
- Raw Δ
- -47.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -43.5
- UI fit score
- 6.5
Ignore
Efton Chism III
WR · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
12.8
(150.2)
Value
27
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-43.8
Efton Chism III
WR · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -137.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -47.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 26.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -47.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -43.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 12.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 27 vs — retention 74 (-47.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 26.6
- Raw Δ
- -47.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -43.8
- UI fit score
- 6.2
Ignore
Sterling Shepard
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
29.4
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-43.9
Sterling Shepard
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -120.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -47.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 26.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -47.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -43.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 29.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 27 vs — retention 74 (-47.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 26.5
- Raw Δ
- -47.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -43.9
- UI fit score
- 6.1
Ignore
Ben Skowronek
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.2
(8.2)
Season
11.6
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-44.1
Ben Skowronek
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -138.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -48.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 26.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -48.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.2
- Season projection
- 11.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 26 vs — retention 74 (-48.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 26.3
- Raw Δ
- -48.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.1
- UI fit score
- 5.9
Ignore
Jamari Thrash
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
35.1
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-44.2
Jamari Thrash
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -115.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -48.2
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 26.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -48.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 35.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 26 vs — retention 74 (-48.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 26.2
- Raw Δ
- -48.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.2
- UI fit score
- 5.8
Ignore
Darius Cooper
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
8.5
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-44.3
Darius Cooper
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -141.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -48.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 26.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -48.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 8.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 26 vs — retention 74 (-48.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 26.2
- Raw Δ
- -48.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.3
- UI fit score
- 5.7
Ignore
Malachi Corley
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.6
(8.2)
Season
9.5
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-44.4
Malachi Corley
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -140.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -48.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 26.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -48.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.6
- Season projection
- 9.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 26 vs — retention 74 (-48.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 26.0
- Raw Δ
- -48.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.4
- UI fit score
- 5.6
Ignore
Jonathan Mingo
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
8.4
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-44.8
Jonathan Mingo
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -141.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -48.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 25.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -48.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 8.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 26 vs — retention 74 (-48.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 25.7
- Raw Δ
- -48.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -44.8
- UI fit score
- 5.2
Ignore
Elijah Moore
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
22.4
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-45.0
Elijah Moore
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -127.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.0
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 25.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -45.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 22.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 25.5
- Raw Δ
- -49.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -45.0
- UI fit score
- 5.0
Ignore
Zay Jones
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
30.1
(150.2)
Value
25
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-45.3
Zay Jones
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -120.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 25.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -45.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 30.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 25.1
- Raw Δ
- -49.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -45.3
- UI fit score
- 4.7
Ignore
Reggie Virgil
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
8.1
(150.2)
Value
25
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-45.7
Reggie Virgil
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -142.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 24.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -45.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 8.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 24.7
- Raw Δ
- -49.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -45.7
- UI fit score
- 4.3
Ignore
Brycen Tremayne
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
10.3
(150.2)
Value
25
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-45.8
Brycen Tremayne
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -139.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 24.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -45.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 10.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 24.7
- Raw Δ
- -49.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -45.8
- UI fit score
- 4.2
Ignore
Lewis Bond
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
8.3
(150.2)
Value
24
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-46.0
Lewis Bond
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -141.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -50.0
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 24.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -50.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -46.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 8.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 24 vs — retention 74 (-50.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 24.4
- Raw Δ
- -50.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -46.0
- UI fit score
- 4.0
Ignore
Tim Patrick
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
18.6
(150.2)
Value
24
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-46.3
Tim Patrick
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -131.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -50.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 24.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -50.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -46.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 18.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 24 vs — retention 74 (-50.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 24.2
- Raw Δ
- -50.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -46.3
- UI fit score
- 3.7
Ignore
Skyy Moore
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
9.3
(150.2)
Value
24
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-46.4
Skyy Moore
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -140.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -50.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 24.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -50.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -46.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 9.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 24 vs — retention 74 (-50.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 24.1
- Raw Δ
- -50.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -46.4
- UI fit score
- 3.6
Ignore
Kaden Wetjen
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.2
(8.2)
Season
4.1
(150.2)
Value
24
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-46.7
Kaden Wetjen
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -146.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -50.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 23.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -50.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -46.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.2
- Season projection
- 4.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 24 vs — retention 74 (-50.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 23.7
- Raw Δ
- -50.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -46.7
- UI fit score
- 3.3
Ignore
Charlie Jones
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
7.4
(150.2)
Value
23
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-47.3
Charlie Jones
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -142.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -51.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 23.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -51.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -47.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 7.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 23 vs — retention 74 (-51.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 23.2
- Raw Δ
- -51.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -47.3
- UI fit score
- 2.7
Ignore
Tyrell Shavers
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · OUT
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
11.0
(150.2)
Value
23
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-47.3
Tyrell Shavers
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · OUT
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -139.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -51.3
- Injury/status: OUT
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 23.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -51.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -47.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 11.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 23 vs — retention 74 (-51.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 23.2
- Raw Δ
- -51.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -47.3
- UI fit score
- 2.7
Ignore
Casey Washington
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
29.5
(150.2)
Value
23
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-47.6
Casey Washington
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -120.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -51.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 22.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -51.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -47.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 29.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 23 vs — retention 74 (-51.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 22.8
- Raw Δ
- -51.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -47.6
- UI fit score
- 2.4
Ignore
Jalen Reagor
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.9
(8.2)
Season
3.4
(150.2)
Value
23
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-47.8
Jalen Reagor
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -7.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -146.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -51.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 22.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -51.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -47.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.9
- Season projection
- 3.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 23 vs — retention 74 (-51.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 22.7
- Raw Δ
- -51.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -47.8
- UI fit score
- 2.2
Ignore
Tommy Mellott
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
13.3
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-48.3
Tommy Mellott
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -136.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 22.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 13.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 22.1
- Raw Δ
- -52.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.3
- UI fit score
- 1.7
Ignore
Devin Duvernay
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
7.5
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-48.6
Devin Duvernay
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -142.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 7.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 21.8
- Raw Δ
- -52.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.6
- UI fit score
- 1.4
Ignore
Nikko Remigio
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
4.6
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-48.7
Nikko Remigio
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -145.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 4.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 21.8
- Raw Δ
- -52.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.7
- UI fit score
- 1.3
Ignore
Myles Price
WR · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
2.0
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-48.9
Myles Price
WR · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -148.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 2.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 21.6
- Raw Δ
- -52.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.9
- UI fit score
- 1.1
Ignore
Braxton Berrios
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.2
(8.2)
Season
2.5
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-48.9
Braxton Berrios
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -147.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.9
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.2
- Season projection
- 2.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 21.6
- Raw Δ
- -52.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -48.9
- UI fit score
- 1.1
Ignore
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
8.2
(150.2)
Value
21
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-49.2
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -142.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -53.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -53.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 8.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 21 vs — retention 74 (-53.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 21.3
- Raw Δ
- -53.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.2
- UI fit score
- 0.8
Ignore
Trey Palmer
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
11.9
(150.2)
Value
21
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-49.2
Trey Palmer
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -138.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -53.2
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -53.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 11.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 21 vs — retention 74 (-53.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 21.3
- Raw Δ
- -53.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.2
- UI fit score
- 0.8
Ignore
Kameron Johnson
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.2
(8.2)
Season
3.6
(150.2)
Value
21
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-49.4
Kameron Johnson
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -146.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -53.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -53.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.2
- Season projection
- 3.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 21 vs — retention 74 (-53.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 21.1
- Raw Δ
- -53.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.4
- UI fit score
- 0.6
Ignore
LaJohntay Wester
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
1.9
(150.2)
Value
21
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-49.7
LaJohntay Wester
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -148.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -53.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 20.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -53.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 1.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 21 vs — retention 74 (-53.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 20.7
- Raw Δ
- -53.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.7
- UI fit score
- 0.3
Ignore
Anthony Gould
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
4.1
(150.2)
Value
21
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-49.7
Anthony Gould
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -146.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -53.7
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 20.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -53.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 4.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 21 vs — retention 74 (-53.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 20.7
- Raw Δ
- -53.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.7
- UI fit score
- 0.3
Ignore
Gage Larvadain
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
8.4
(150.2)
Value
21
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-49.7
Gage Larvadain
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -141.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -53.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 20.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -53.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 8.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 21 vs — retention 74 (-53.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 20.7
- Raw Δ
- -53.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -49.7
- UI fit score
- 0.3
Ignore
Britain Covey
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
1.7
(150.2)
Value
20
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-50.8
Britain Covey
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -148.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -54.8
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -54.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -50.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 1.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 20 vs — retention 74 (-54.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 19.7
- Raw Δ
- -54.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -50.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jacob Cowing
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
1.1
(150.2)
Value
20
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-50.8
Jacob Cowing
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -149.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -54.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -54.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -50.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 1.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 20 vs — retention 74 (-54.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 19.6
- Raw Δ
- -54.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -50.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
KhaDarel Hodge
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
10.8
(150.2)
Value
20
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-50.8
KhaDarel Hodge
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -139.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -54.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -54.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -50.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 10.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 20 vs — retention 74 (-54.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 19.6
- Raw Δ
- -54.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -50.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jalin Hyatt
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
7.9
(150.2)
Value
19
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-51.2
Jalin Hyatt
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -142.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -55.2
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -55.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 7.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 19 vs — retention 74 (-55.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 19.2
- Raw Δ
- -55.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jordan Watkins
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
7.8
(150.2)
Value
19
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-51.3
Jordan Watkins
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -142.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -55.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -55.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 7.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 19 vs — retention 74 (-55.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 19.1
- Raw Δ
- -55.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Cody White
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
5.1
(150.2)
Value
19
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-51.5
Cody White
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -145.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -55.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -55.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 5.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 19 vs — retention 74 (-55.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 18.9
- Raw Δ
- -55.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Trent Sherfield
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
8.9
(150.2)
Value
19
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-51.5
Trent Sherfield
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -141.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -55.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -55.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 8.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 19 vs — retention 74 (-55.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 18.9
- Raw Δ
- -55.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Josh Cameron
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.3
(150.2)
Value
19
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-51.7
Josh Cameron
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -149.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -55.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -55.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 19 vs — retention 74 (-55.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 18.8
- Raw Δ
- -55.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -51.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Scotty Miller
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
4.0
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.0
Scotty Miller
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -146.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.0
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.0
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 4.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.0 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 18.5
- Raw Δ
- -56.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ke'Shawn Williams
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
1.0
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.1
Ke'Shawn Williams
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -149.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.1
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 1.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 18.3
- Raw Δ
- -56.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Gunner Olszewski
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
2.4
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.3
Gunner Olszewski
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -147.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.3
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 2.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 18.1
- Raw Δ
- -56.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jalen Brooks
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.3
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.5
Jalen Brooks
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -149.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 18.0
- Raw Δ
- -56.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
John Metchie III
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
1.2
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.5
John Metchie III
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -149.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 1.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 17.9
- Raw Δ
- -56.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
DeAndre Carter
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
11.0
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.5
DeAndre Carter
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -139.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.5
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 11.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 17.9
- Raw Δ
- -56.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tylan Wallace
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
4.8
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.6
Tylan Wallace
WR · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -145.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 4.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 17.8
- Raw Δ
- -56.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ryan Miller
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
10.9
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.7
Ryan Miller
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -139.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 10.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 17.7
- Raw Δ
- -56.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dareke Young
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.4
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.8
Dareke Young
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -149.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 17.7
- Raw Δ
- -56.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Xavier Weaver
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
4.4
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-52.9
Xavier Weaver
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -145.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.9
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 4.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 17.6
- Raw Δ
- -56.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -52.9
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jeshaun Jones
WR · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.1
(150.2)
Value
17
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-53.5
Jeshaun Jones
WR · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -57.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -57.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -53.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 17 vs — retention 74 (-57.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 17.0
- Raw Δ
- -57.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -53.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Mason Kinsey
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.1
(150.2)
Value
17
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-53.6
Mason Kinsey
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -57.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 16.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -57.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -53.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 17 vs — retention 74 (-57.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 16.8
- Raw Δ
- -57.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -53.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Bryce Oliver
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
8.6
(150.2)
Value
17
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-53.8
Bryce Oliver
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -141.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -57.8
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 16.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -57.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -53.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 8.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 17 vs — retention 74 (-57.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 16.7
- Raw Δ
- -57.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -53.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Beaux Collins
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
4.2
(150.2)
Value
16
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-53.9
Beaux Collins
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -146.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -57.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 16.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -57.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -53.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 4.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 17 vs — retention 74 (-57.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 16.5
- Raw Δ
- -57.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -53.9
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Michael Bandy
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.2
(150.2)
Value
16
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-54.5
Michael Bandy
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -58.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 16.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -58.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -54.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 16 vs — retention 74 (-58.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 16.0
- Raw Δ
- -58.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -54.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dee Eskridge
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
5.4
(150.2)
Value
15
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-55.2
Dee Eskridge
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -144.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -59.2
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 15.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -59.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -55.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 5.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 15 vs — retention 74 (-59.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 15.3
- Raw Δ
- -59.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -55.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Xavier Gipson
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
4.3
(150.2)
Value
15
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-55.8
Xavier Gipson
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -145.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -59.8
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 14.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -59.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -55.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 4.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 15 vs — retention 74 (-59.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 14.7
- Raw Δ
- -59.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -55.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Chris Brazzell II
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
14
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-56.3
Chris Brazzell II
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -60.3
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 14.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -60.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -56.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 14 vs — retention 74 (-60.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 14.1
- Raw Δ
- -60.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -56.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jamal Agnew
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
3.2
(150.2)
Value
14
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-56.6
Jamal Agnew
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -147.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -60.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 13.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -60.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -56.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 3.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 14 vs — retention 74 (-60.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 13.8
- Raw Δ
- -60.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -56.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Lil'Jordan Humphrey
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
13
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-57.3
Lil'Jordan Humphrey
WR · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -61.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 13.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -61.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -57.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 13 vs — retention 74 (-61.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 13.2
- Raw Δ
- -61.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -57.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Malik Heath
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
4.2
(150.2)
Value
13
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-57.3
Malik Heath
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -146.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -61.3
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 13.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -61.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -57.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 4.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 13 vs — retention 74 (-61.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 13.1
- Raw Δ
- -61.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -57.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jermaine Burton
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
1.0
(150.2)
Value
13
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-57.6
Jermaine Burton
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -149.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -61.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 12.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -61.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -57.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 1.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 13 vs — retention 74 (-61.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 12.8
- Raw Δ
- -61.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -57.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Javon Baker
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.2
(150.2)
Value
12
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-58.2
Javon Baker
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -62.2
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 12.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.2
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -58.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 12 vs — retention 74 (-62.2 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 12.3
- Raw Δ
- -62.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -58.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kadarius Toney
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
12
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-58.4
Kadarius Toney
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -62.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 12.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -58.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 12 vs — retention 74 (-62.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 12.0
- Raw Δ
- -62.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -58.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Mecole Hardman Jr.
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
12
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-58.9
Mecole Hardman Jr.
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -62.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -58.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 12 vs — retention 74 (-62.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 11.5
- Raw Δ
- -62.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -58.9
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tom Kennedy
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-59.3
Tom Kennedy
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 11.1
- Raw Δ
- -63.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Bub Means
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-59.3
Bub Means
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.3
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 11.1
- Raw Δ
- -63.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Amari Cooper
WR · 13 · WAIVERS
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-59.3
Amari Cooper
WR · 13 · WAIVERS
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.3
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.3
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.3 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 11.1
- Raw Δ
- -63.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Laquon Treadwell
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-59.6
Laquon Treadwell
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.8
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ja'Lynn Polk
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-59.6
Ja'Lynn Polk
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.8
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Cedrick Wilson Jr.
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-59.8
Cedrick Wilson Jr.
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.8
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.7
- Raw Δ
- -63.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dominic Lovett
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-59.8
Dominic Lovett
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.7
- Raw Δ
- -63.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -59.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Quez Watkins
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.4
Quez Watkins
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.1
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
D.J. Montgomery
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.4
D.J. Montgomery
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.1
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ja'Corey Brooks
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.4
Ja'Corey Brooks
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.1
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Chris Moore
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.4
Chris Moore
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.1
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Equanimeous St. Brown
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.4
Equanimeous St. Brown
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.1
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
John Ross
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.4
John Ross
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.1
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Isaiah Hodgins
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.4
Isaiah Hodgins
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.1
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Junior Bergen
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.4
Junior Bergen
WR · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 10.1
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Terrace Marshall Jr.
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.8
Terrace Marshall Jr.
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 9.7
- Raw Δ
- -64.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tahj Washington
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.8
Tahj Washington
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 9.7
- Raw Δ
- -64.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Theo Wease Jr.
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.8
Theo Wease Jr.
WR · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 9.7
- Raw Δ
- -64.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dylan Drummond
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-60.8
Dylan Drummond
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.8
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 9.7
- Raw Δ
- -64.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -60.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Chris Blair
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Chris Blair
WR · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Xavier Restrepo
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Xavier Restrepo
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ricky White III
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Ricky White III
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tim Jones
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Tim Jones
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Mike Williams
WR · 24 · WAIVERS
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Mike Williams
WR · 24 · WAIVERS
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dante Pettis
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Dante Pettis
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Gabe Davis
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Gabe Davis
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jermaine Jackson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Jermaine Jackson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Isaiah Neyor
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Isaiah Neyor
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
David Sills V
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
David Sills V
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Johnny Wilson
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Johnny Wilson
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Robbie Chosen
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Robbie Chosen
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Maurice Alexander
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Maurice Alexander
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
River Cracraft
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
River Cracraft
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Simi Fehoko
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Simi Fehoko
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Cornelius Johnson
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Cornelius Johnson
WR · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Malik Cunningham
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Malik Cunningham
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
K.J. Osborn
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
K.J. Osborn
WR · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jaylen Johnson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Jaylen Johnson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kaden Davis
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Kaden Davis
WR · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Anthony Miller
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Anthony Miller
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tyler Scott
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Tyler Scott
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Brenden Rice
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Brenden Rice
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Phillip Dorsett II
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Phillip Dorsett II
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Joshua Cephus
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Joshua Cephus
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ihmir Smith-Marsette
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
9
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-61.6
Ihmir Smith-Marsette
WR · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.6
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 8.9
- Raw Δ
- -65.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -61.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Deven Thompkins
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-62.8
Deven Thompkins
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.8
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 7.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 7.6
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Andre Baccellia
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-62.8
Andre Baccellia
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.8
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 7.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 7.6
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
A.T. Perry
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-62.8
A.T. Perry
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.8
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 7.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 7.6
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kevin Austin Jr.
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-62.8
Kevin Austin Jr.
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.8
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 7.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 7.6
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Austin Trammell
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-62.8
Austin Trammell
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.8
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 7.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.8 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 7.6
- Raw Δ
- -66.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -62.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dez Fitzpatrick
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Dez Fitzpatrick
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Samori Toure
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Samori Toure
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Robert Woods
WR · · WAIVERS
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Robert Woods
WR · · WAIVERS
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ronnie Bell
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Ronnie Bell
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dan Chisena
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Dan Chisena
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Irv Charles
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Irv Charles
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dennis Houston
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Dennis Houston
WR · 27 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tejhaun Palmer
WR · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Tejhaun Palmer
WR · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Danny Gray
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Danny Gray
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Laviska Shenault Jr.
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Laviska Shenault Jr.
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Alex Bachman
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Alex Bachman
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kaden Prather
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Kaden Prather
WR · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tay Martin
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Tay Martin
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tyreik McAllister
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Tyreik McAllister
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tyler Boyd
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Tyler Boyd
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Terrell Bynum
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Terrell Bynum
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jalen Virgil
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Jalen Virgil
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jha'Quan Jackson
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Jha'Quan Jackson
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Michael Woods II
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Michael Woods II
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Bryce Ford-Wheaton
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Bryce Ford-Wheaton
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Alex Erickson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Alex Erickson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Nelson Agholor
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Nelson Agholor
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Erik Ezukanma
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Erik Ezukanma
WR · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Chandler Brayboy
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Chandler Brayboy
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Chris Conley
WR · · WAIVERS
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Chris Conley
WR · · WAIVERS
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jason Brownlee
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Jason Brownlee
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Brandon Powell
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Brandon Powell
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Parris Campbell
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Parris Campbell
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Elijah Cooks
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Elijah Cooks
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Zach Pascal
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Zach Pascal
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Collin Johnson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Collin Johnson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
DJ Chark
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
DJ Chark
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jamison Crowder
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Jamison Crowder
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Allen Robinson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Allen Robinson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kristian Wilkerson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Kristian Wilkerson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Brandon Johnson
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Brandon Johnson
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ainias Smith
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Ainias Smith
WR · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ramel Keyton
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Ramel Keyton
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Diontae Johnson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Diontae Johnson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Joseph Ngata
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Joseph Ngata
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Chase Cota
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Chase Cota
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jared Wayne
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Jared Wayne
WR · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Shedrick Jackson
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Shedrick Jackson
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Nick Nash
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Nick Nash
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Justin Shorter
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Justin Shorter
WR · 13 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kendric Pryor
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Kendric Pryor
WR · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jalen Moreno-Cropper
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Jalen Moreno-Cropper
WR · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Trenton Irwin
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Trenton Irwin
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Brandon Smith
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Brandon Smith
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Trent Taylor
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Trent Taylor
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
David Bell
WR · 5 · WAIVERS
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
David Bell
WR · 5 · WAIVERS
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Colton Dowell
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-63.6
Colton Dowell
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.6
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.6 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 6.8
- Raw Δ
- -67.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Deion Burks
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
6
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-64.9
Deion Burks
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -68.9
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -68.9
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -64.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 6 vs — retention 74 (-68.9 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.5
- Raw Δ
- -68.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -64.9
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
DJ Turner
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
DJ Turner
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kearis Jackson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Kearis Jackson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Trishton Jackson
WR · · WAIVERS
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Trishton Jackson
WR · · WAIVERS
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Deonte Harty
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Deonte Harty
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tony Brown
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Tony Brown
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Justyn Ross
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Justyn Ross
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Steven Sims
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Steven Sims
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jaelon Darden
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Jaelon Darden
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
James Proche II
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
James Proche II
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Marquez Callaway
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Marquez Callaway
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Antoine Green
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Antoine Green
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Cody Thompson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Cody Thompson
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Rakim Jarrett
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Rakim Jarrett
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Montrell Washington
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Montrell Washington
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Grant DuBose
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.1
Grant DuBose
WR · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -69.1
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.1 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Emmanuel Henderson Jr.
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-65.5
Emmanuel Henderson Jr.
WR · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -69.5
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.5
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.5 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 5.0
- Raw Δ
- -69.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -65.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jakobie Keeney-James
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
4
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-66.7
Jakobie Keeney-James
WR · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -70.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 3.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 4 vs — retention 74 (-70.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 3.8
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kendrick Law
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
4
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-66.7
Kendrick Law
WR · 8 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -70.7
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 3.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 4 vs — retention 74 (-70.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 3.8
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
CJ Williams
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
4
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-66.7
CJ Williams
WR · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -70.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 3.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 4 vs — retention 74 (-70.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 3.8
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Malik Turner
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
4
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-66.7
Malik Turner
WR · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -70.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 3.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 4 vs — retention 74 (-70.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 3.8
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Anthony Smith
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
4
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-66.7
Anthony Smith
WR · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -70.7
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 3.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 4 vs — retention 74 (-70.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 3.8
- Raw Δ
- -70.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -66.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Brennan Presley
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-68.7
Brennan Presley
WR · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 1.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 1.7
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jacoby Jones
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-68.7
Jacoby Jones
WR · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 1.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 1.7
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Russell Gage Jr.
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-68.7
Russell Gage Jr.
WR · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 1.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 1.7
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dalevon Campbell
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-68.7
Dalevon Campbell
WR · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 1.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 1.7
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Quentin Skinner
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-68.7
Quentin Skinner
WR · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 1.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 1.7
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Coleman Owen
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-68.7
Coleman Owen
WR · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 1.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 1.7
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dalen Cambre
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-68.7
Dalen Cambre
WR · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 1.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 1.7
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jimmy Holiday
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
+4.0
Net
-68.7
Jimmy Holiday
WR · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Pros
- Improves the Longboys' identified WR need
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.7
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 1.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster fit
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.7 before roster-fit adjustment); small bonus for the Longboys' identified WR improvement path
- Player Value
- 1.7
- Raw Δ
- -72.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- +4.0
- Net Δ
- -68.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0